The Supreme Court has established a precedent that will have practical implications in many proceedings involving the transfer of liability. When a corporation has already been liquidated and dissolved, the tax authorities cannot take direct action against the director. Instead, they must first seek to collect the debt from the shareholders who have legally succeeded in the corporation.
The way the tax authorities must claim a tax debt when a corporation has been dissolved and liquidated has just been significantly clarified by the Supreme Court (SC). Ruling No. 764/2026, dated June 18, establishes a precedent that directly affects directors and shareholders, as it determines the correct procedure to follow before initiating a liability transfer.
Until now, there were differing interpretations as to whether the tax authorities could act directly against the director or whether they must first claim the debt from the shareholders who have succeeded the dissolved company. The SC resolves this issue and establishes an order that must be followed going forward.
If a company has been liquidated and still has outstanding tax debts, it is advisable to carefully review any liability transfer proceedings that the tax authorities may initiate.
Els socis passen a ocupar la posició de la societat
Quan una societat desapareix jurídicament després de la seva liquidació, no desapareixen automàticament les obligacions tributàries que tenien pendents. La Llei General Tributària (LGT) preveu que aquests deutes es transmetin als socis dins dels límits legalment establerts.
En altres paraules, des del moment en què la societat deixa d’existir, són els socis els qui passen a ocupar la posició de l’antic obligat tributari. L’Administració ha de continuar enfront d’ells el procediment recaptatori previst per la llei.
L’extinció registral d’una societat no elimina els deutes tributaris pendents ni impedeix que Hisenda continuï reclamant-les.
The Partners Assume the Company’s Position
When a company ceases to exist legally following its liquidation, its outstanding tax obligations do not automatically disappear. The General Tax Law (LGT) provides that these debts are transferred to the partners within the limits established by law.
In other words, from the moment the corporation ceases to exist, the shareholders assume the position of the former taxpayer. The tax authorities must continue the collection proceedings provided for by law against them.
The removal of a corporation from the registry does not eliminate outstanding tax debts nor does it prevent the tax authorities from continuing to collect them.
Successors and Liable Parties Are Not the Same
The ruling devotes a significant portion to distinguishing between two concepts that are often confused. The partners are the successors to the dissolved company. In other words, they assume the tax obligations because the law provides so when the legal entity ceases to exist.
The administrator, on the other hand, is liable only as a subsidiary liable party when the legally prescribed requirements are met. These are distinct roles, subject to different legal regimes and different procedures.
Confusing the succession of debts with tax liability can lead to administrative actions that contravene legal procedure.
The Director’s Protections Are Strengthened
The Supreme Court also focuses on the legal protection of the director. If the tax authorities could claim debts directly from the director without first acting against the shareholders, two particularly relevant rights would be rendered virtually meaningless. On the one hand, the right to be held in the first instance, which is inherent to any subsidiary liability. On the other hand, there is the director’s right to subsequently recover the amount paid from the actual debtor. Furthermore, the Court warns of the risk that the same debts could be claimed by both the shareholders and the director, creating situations that are difficult to justify legally.
Proper handling of the proceedings is essential to avoid duplicate claims or violations of the director’s rights.
Special Caution Regarding Tax Penalties
The ruling also makes an important clarification regarding penalties. Although the law provides for certain cases in which penalties may be transferred to successors, the Court notes that penalties must be interpreted in accordance with the constitutional principles of culpability and individual liability. This means that such a transfer cannot occur automatically; rather, it requires an assessment of the specific circumstances that justify such liability.
Not all tax penalties can be automatically transferred to the partners of a dissolved partnership.
The Legal Doctrine Established by the Supreme Court
The ruling establishes a legal precedent that will serve as a reference for future proceedings.
In summary:
- Tax debts owed by a liquidated and dissolved corporation must first be claimed from the shareholders who are its legal successors.
- Only when appropriate under legal procedure may the director be held secondary liable.
- The tax authorities cannot act as if the dissolved corporation continued to exist solely for the purpose of transferring the debt to the director.
- The succession of debts provided for in the General Tax Law constitutes a mandatory mechanism and not an option for the tax authorities.
Companies undergoing liquidation, as well as their partners and directors, should review any procedures for transferring liability considering this new Supreme Court ruling.
For more information, consult a tax advisor.
If you find this interesting, please share it on social media—thank you!
